Hence distilling the statistical phase contribution from the overall phase is quite difficult. The problem is that the phase factors may arise from other sources such as the Aharonov-Bohm effect, the dynamical phase, etc. Unfortunately, the relative simplicity of their statistics is also the reason why they are so difficult to detect experimentally. The reason they are called Abelian is because the exchange of two such anyons leads to a nontrivial phase acquired by their wave function, and a series of exchanges merely results in multiple phase factors whose order is irrelevant. “Conventional” Abelian anyons have been conjectured to exist in a number of fractional quantum Hall states, yet despite several attempts, their braiding statistics have never been established conclusively. Writing in Physical Review B, Robert Willett and colleagues from Bell Laboratories in the US present experiments that demonstrate the existence of a very special kind of “non-Abelian” anyons. Naturally, one has to go to very low temperatures in search of such quasiparticles, and this is exactly the regime in which the fractional quantum Hall effect-the primary “playground” for finding anyons-is observed. In particular, they can act as anyons-particles whose braiding statistics is neither bosonic nor fermionic. Experimentally, when you confine electrons to an atomically thin layer by essentially electrostatic means, the low-energy collective excitations of the system now behave as two-dimensional particles (although the higher-energy excitations are still conventional electrons). In three or more dimensions, one could continuously deform such trajectories into each other, rendering the two operations identical. In two dimensions, swapping the positions of two particles in a clockwise manner is distinct from doing it counterclockwise. However, particles confined to two dimensions aren’t limited to obeying the exchange rules of bosons and fermions. It is well known that a wave function of two identical bosons is symmetric upon their exchange, while it is antisymmetric for two fermions. He also said, “This field…will not tell us much of fundamental physics (in the sense of, ‘What are the strange particles?’) but…it might tell us much of great interest about the strange phenomena that occur in complex situations.” Well, as it turns out, such strange phenomena may, in fact, involve very unusual new particles. Half a century ago, Richard Feynman famously proclaimed, “There’s plenty of room at the bottom,” while attempting to foresee the developments in what nowadays has become nanoscience and nanotechnology. (d) Aharonov-Bohm oscillations with sweeping of the gate voltage at filling factor ν = 5 / 2 from e / 4 and e / 2 quasiparticles. (c) Electron micrograph of the interferometric device. Figure 1: The distinct quantum states resulting from particle worldlines in (a) and (b) do not interfere with each other if they follow non-Abelian statistics. On a slightly related note, can gravity effect foam? I tried making a waterfall of tiny bubbles, but they just blew all over the screen - I couldn't get them to "fall". (I guess I could also add blur-length variables to these tight-curve keyframes such that as the particles go over the curve, their blur length shortens - oooooh, that seems like a hack). I'd like the lines to follow the curve of the particles. If I just throw a bunch of keyframes in there (with the direction-blur angle monkeyed with as they go over the edge), I get an effect that looks like 20-pixel sticks going over a waterfall. When I try a directional blur, that, of course, only works in one predefined direction. I can apply an actual motion blur, but it doesn't blur 'em nearly as much as I would like. What I'd like is to have a loooong motion blur (say, 20 pixels) on each particle. This is good - it's supposed to look like a waterfall. I've pointed the gun 90 degrees and things operate as I expect, with my particles coming out and then falling down (I have gravity). I have a solid layer, to which I've applied a Particle Playground simulation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |